Ranking summary
Tip: click on team's record to toggle filter.
| Sym. | Explanation |
|---|
| * | Tie stands |
| ** | Total points scored when tied teams met (18) |
| b | Total points scored when tied teams met (24) |
Round 2
| ↓ vs → | Record | Yale | Brown | Roger Williams | Harvard | Tufts | MIT |
|---|
| Yale Bulldogs | 4-0 | X | X | W (1-2-3) | W (1-2-4) | W (1-2-5) | W (1-2-3) |
|---|
| Brown Bears | 4-0 | X | X | W (2-3-4) | W (1-2-3) | W (1-2-4) | W (1-2-4) |
|---|
| Roger Williams Hawks | 2-2 | L (4-5-6) | L (1-5-6) | X | W (2-3-4) | X | W (1-3-4) |
|---|
| Harvard Crimson | 1-3 | L (3-5-6) | L (4-5-6) | L (1-5-6) | X | W (1-2-4) | X |
|---|
| Tufts Jumbos | 0-4 | L (3-4-6) | L (3-5-6) | X | L (3-5-6) | X | L (3-4-5) |
|---|
| MIT Engineers | 1-3 | L (4-5-6) | L (3-5-6) | L (2-5-6) | X | W (1-2-6) | X |
|---|
Round 1
| ↓ vs → | Record | Brown | Harvard | MIT | Roger Williams | Tufts | Yale |
|---|
| Brown Bears | 4-1 | X | W (1-2-5) | W (1-2-3) | W (1-3-4) | W (1-3-4) | L (3-4-6) |
|---|
| Harvard Crimson | 1-4 | L (3-4-6) | X | W (1-2-5) | L (2-4-5) | L (2-4-5) | L (3-5-6) |
|---|
| MIT Engineers | 2-3 | L (4-5-6) | L (3-4-6) | X | W (1-2-5) | W (1-2-5) | L (4-5-6) |
|---|
| Roger Williams Hawks | 1-4 | L (2-5-6) | W (1-3-6) | L (3-4-6) | X | L (1-5-6) | L (3-4-6) |
|---|
| Tufts Jumbos | 2-3 | L (2-5-6) | W (1-3-6) | L (3-4-6) | W (2-3-4) | X | L (3-5-6) |
|---|
| Yale Bulldogs | 5-0 | W (1-2-5) | W (1-2-4) | W (1-2-3) | W (1-2-5) | W (1-2-4) | X |
|---|
